发信人: windream (0024·2004·思念是一种饼), 信区: ANSI
标 题: ·﹒.关于使用原创ANSI作品标题前缀的呼吁帖 .﹒·
发信站: 日月光华 (2007年08月02日23:32:57 星期四), 站内信件
喜欢ANSI的盆友们,在大家享受着b2a转图的快感的时候,在大家满意于AE3神奇的
垫图功能的时候,你有没有想过,自己可能无意间侵犯了别人的版权呢?
或许有的人会说,什么嘛,我转载的标了[转载],也不去盗用和更改别人的图,怎
么还有人jjww,哦,表急,请听我讲。
ANSI的狭义版权,在ANSI圈子内都得到了普遍的赞同,即别人做的图不能随意盗用
,转载需要完整作者信息,甚至有时需要征求作者同意才可以转载。但广义上看,一件
艺术作品的版权还包括它的创意、手法和细节。使用了b2a转图,只要有心仪的画便可八
九不离十的得到一件还算不错的[作品],而完全不需要考虑构图;使用了AE3的垫图功能
,除了构图外,甚至可以提醒自己一些小细节、小笔法;或是拿图片或别人的作品,自
己照画一幅,但创意上来说,还能说是完全的原创么?轻则可说有欺骗观众之嫌,重则
是盗用了其他作品的创意来装点自己的门面,与可恶的盗图者又有什么分别涅。
心虚之余,在此号召所有ANSI界黑道白道的盆友们,在发表原创作品时在标题上对
此类作品加以前缀标注:
[描红]:主体上使用了AE3的垫图层功能的作品,即作画时将图片垫在下面,自己用透明
ANSI画布进行描临的方式
[转图]:主体上使用了b2a的转换功能,即用bmp图片转成ANSI后进行修改完善
[临摹]:作品本身参照了别人现有的作品画成,或参照了某一非ANSI形式的艺术作品画
成,如照片、书籍、插画等
这样的标准或许很难做到非常严格,毕竟各种程度的借鉴都是原创的基础,但希望
大家对此有所共识,从自己做起,保护原创创意。也希望能借此机会,激发更多基于ANSI
平台上的原创想法,用ANSI,来思考。
windream@fudan拟 2007.08.02
--
※ 来源:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 10.8.225.9]
Sender: windream 0024 2004 Missing is a kind of cake, message area: ANSI
Title: ﹒ Post regarding the use of title prefixes for original ANSI works.﹒
Sending site: Sun and Moon Guanghua Thursday, August 02, 2007 23:32:57, site mail
Friends who like ANSI, when everyone is enjoying the pleasure of b2a transfer, everyone is satisfied with the magical effect of AE3
When using the overlay function, have you ever thought that you might inadvertently infringe someone else’s copyright?
Maybe some people will say, what? I reposted it with the [Reprint] mark, and I don’t steal or change other people’s pictures. Why?
Is there anyone else jjww Oh, I’m urgent. Please listen to me.
ANSI's narrow copyright has been generally agreed upon in the ANSI circle, that is, pictures made by others cannot be stolen at will.
Reprinting requires complete author information, and sometimes even requires the author's consent before reprinting. But in a broad sense, one
The copyright of an artistic work also includes its creativity, technique and details. If you use b2a to transfer pictures, you can do it as long as you have a favorite painting.
I almost got a pretty good [work] without having to think about the composition at all. I used the underlay function of AE3.
In addition to composition, you can even remind yourself of some small details, small brushwork, or use pictures or other people's works to create your own.
I took a picture, but in terms of creativity, can it still be said to be completely original? At least it may be said to be deceiving the audience, at worst
He has stolen the creativity of other works to decorate his own appearance. What is the difference between him and the abominable picture thief?
With a guilty conscience, I would like to call on all my friends in the ANSI world to comment on the title when publishing original works.
Such works are marked with the prefix
[Red Painting] The main body of the work uses the pad layer function of AE3. That is, when painting, the picture is padded underneath and the transparent layer is used.
ANSI canvas tracing method
[Image transfer] The main body uses the conversion function of b2a, that is, converting bmp pictures to ANSI and then modifying and improving them.
[Copy] The work itself is drawn with reference to other people’s existing works, or it is drawn with reference to a certain non-ANSI form of art work.
Such as photos, books, illustrations, etc.
It may be difficult to achieve such a strict standard. After all, all levels of reference are the basis of originality. But I hope
Everyone has a consensus on this. We should start from ourselves to protect original creativity. We also hope to take this opportunity to inspire more ANSI-based
Original ideas on the platform Think in ANSI
windream@fudan 2007.08.02
Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.8.225.9]