作者 Gatchaman ( ) 站内 asciiart
标题 Re: [ANSI] 花
时间 Sat May 1 08:02:42 2010
───────────────────────────────────────
※ 引述《Gatchaman ( )》之铭言∶
: 别担心,既然是所谓的踢爆,当然还有其他地方可以抓。
: 再来的这张图,是点出一些特别部位∶http://i.imgur.com/HwoIN.png
: 同样是只有这个转图软体才会出现的问题,
: 那就是在一些预设背景的区块,没有任何前景符号的时候,
: 前景色全部会设定成黑色,转完后便存在,
: 也就是检查图中圈出的地方,看看其原始码,
: 照说不会出现黑色的色码,却多余的出现了。
: 哦,还是要拗作图习惯吗?那为什么不会是其他颜色的色码?
: 这种情况,在他的图里目前算是比较少出现了,
: 也许是有注意,或是改变绘图习惯,
: 但比较往前一点的图,绝对很多,大家有兴趣可以慢慢玩找碴游戏。
Good,还以为能全部硬拗过去,想不到也有避重就轻跳过去的部分嘛,
就请解释上面这段就行,这绝对是此软体最大的特征之一。
把转图贴出来就能回避事实?就当你是照著画的,
前文早就说过,除非原图一样,不然转出来的图绝不可能一样,
不自然的部分也并不是所谓倒刺问题,倒刺早在圣斗士套图敝人就已接纳采用。
重点是那绝非一般画手的思维模式,当看到两个都是接近45度的斜角,
为何要将一个刻意错开处理,追求细微的表现?
事实上只要再将图放大一点点,转图软体便会将两个斜度作一模一样的平滑处理。
这边再来追加∶
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joanmoon/3624873982/
▁ ╱ ◢ . ╱ ╲~~ . ╲\╲╲▏
▕ ▏ ╱ ▉ ╱ / /◣ ╲︷,╲ \╲\▊
▕枫▏ _.-~~, __ / / ╱◤ / "▆▃ \ ╲"\\ ▍
▕ ▏ ╱ ▕╲◢▅.▎ ’ ▏/ /.'▕▎ ▉ }>, \ '│▍
▔ ╱ / ▎ ▕▍~,︵▊◢ //▍{▏▂▃ㄧ▋▎>_ \ \▎
╱ /▕╲ ㄟ<7_)=.▍// ▕//◤~︷. / ▍=_._\ ▊▏
/ / !▉▊>~~╮)▎/▊◣▏▏▅_~▅>▊◢/◢λ\ \
__ / / /▊▏▍▏\_λ}▏{|◣▍"(_`▆▇ ◤▄ _◣▍`▎ `
{▃╲} ╱ /◢▍▊ ◣}~,◢=\‘▊/ 〝\~-ˊ=λ/ ◢▃◢▊▏
╲◥=| ◢◢▆◢◤/ ◢◤◥▊`.╲ `~ ╲ .▏'◢\ /◣
_\▄▏ ◢ _◤▊◢"▊◤ㄟ.人},▏╲╲\ㄟ_ _,ˋ ╱ \√}◣◣'▏◣
_╱▂▃\_ ◢ .=▄.=◤◤▕▋{ ~)ζ▊◣╲\\▎_▔ ◢"▏/_╱▏◢'
_▏◢▆◣`▁▃▆ _▄◤/▆◢◢ˋv~◢▊◥\`\▍ ▔ ▂▅/▋_-╲▄ ◢▊ /◥
来看这张图,这就是其竞争心态所显露出来的马脚,
对照一下,不是比例抓得很准吗?
为什么人物的右眼不见了?为什么发型也不太一样?
这就是用惯此转图软体的弊病,
转人物图时,图变小细节就会糊在一块,尤其眼睛最明显,
事实上也正是因为转图会比例正确才带来这样的结果,
当图变小,眼睛占用的空间也会变小,
而转大图神韵就会很准,因为眼睛的轮廓细节也清楚了,有足够空间去表现。
当别人误解你所写的字是原创时,有第一时间跳出来澄清吗?
被踢爆时倒是回的很快,
不常上站?应该是用分身一直在观察吧?
前面一堆设计书法字也同样不是原创,
http://www.ooopic.com/home-5-96-309--.html
非得要一张一张翻出来给大家看才行是吧,有澄清过吗?
这也同样不是所谓参考图或著作权问题,而是人品问题,虚荣心问题,
事后的道歉不过是不得已而为之。
行的正?夜半时分摸摸自己的良心,睡得著吗?
根本也不用什么约出来,真相已昭然若揭,
相信还是有人眼睛是雪亮的。
真要约,敢出来画?说一堆废话模糊焦点的不知道是谁,
很抱歉敝人不会随你的鬼故事为之起舞,
要玩口水战请找别人。
但没人要你消失,要的只是诚实,
相信很多人还是喜欢你的线条处理,
为什么这么多年没踢爆你,自己好好想想。
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
推 kissinwang:g大竟然这么清楚的说出来了... 05/01 11:11
→ kissinwang:有关p大的作品,还好我也都备份我要的部份了...囧 05/01 11:13
→ kissinwang:其实也要蛮感谢p大转到这边来分享~话说我以前文章也 05/01 11:14
→ kissinwang:被共匪抄去...没有附上我的名字~~囧 05/01 11:15
→ furbyyeh:ptt平台真的很棒 感谢ptt code把宽度放大 有更多发挥空间 05/01 11:36
推 dannc:应该是要说∶「阿『神韵』不是抓得很准?」才对吧? 05/01 12:08
→ el4e8d:书法那件事P大也道歉了吧 何必对已道歉的事穷追猛打 05/01 14:28
推 xfroscar:Ga大求求你把那些食物的图片放回来~~~ > <a 05/01 15:10
→ max9970:你到底想怎样? 你这样对这版有什么好处阿 05/01 15:34
→ max9970:真怕以后看不到 令人感动的图了 05/01 15:35
→ onelife:P大发图从没说过无参考阿,老实说我看不懂G大在干嘛... 05/01 15:59
推 icosahedron:即使G可能是错的,但是这样的讨论绝对有好处 05/01 16:04
推 abckk:有啥好处? asciiart板上损失两个神级人物吗? 05/01 16:06
→ icosahedron:对话可以不必这么强硬,但其他人不该限制双方发言 05/01 16:06
→ icosahedron:喔,不讲真话出来损失的更多,这有点经验的人都懂 05/01 16:07
→ icosahedron:某方面来说,对于真相无关紧要的态度,损失会更多 05/01 16:09
→ icosahedron:只是今天方式还是有些不妥,因为这种事证据很能确切 05/01 16:10
→ icosahedron:可能还要加上以前的一切事情吧,才会有这种冲突 05/01 16:10
→ pilione:我只看到一个人不停退让 一个人死缠烂打 推m大说的 05/01 17:05
推 snoopyiou:真相应该能愈辩愈明吧 我也觉得这讨论不错 顺便学很多 05/01 17:12
Author Gatchaman Site asciiart
Title Re: [ANSI] flower
Time Sat May 1 08:02:42 2010
Quotes from Gatchaman
: Don’t worry. Since it’s the so-called kicking, of course there are other places to catch.
: This next picture highlights some special parts http: i.imgur.com HwoIN.png
: This is also a problem that only occurs with this image transfer software.
: That is when some preset background blocks do not have any foreground symbols.
: All foreground colors will be set to black and will exist after the transfer is completed.
: That is, check the area circled in the picture to see its source code
: It was said that the black color code would not appear, but it appeared redundantly.
: Oh, do you still have to get used to drawing? Then why aren’t there color codes for other colors?
: This kind of situation appears relatively rarely in his pictures.
: Maybe it’s because I paid attention or changed my drawing habits.
: But there are definitely a lot of pictures that are a bit further forward. If you are interested, you can slowly play the fault-finding game.
Good I thought I could push through them all, but I didn’t expect that there were also some parts where I just skipped over to avoid the important points.
Just please explain the above paragraph. This is definitely one of the biggest features of this software.
Posting the reprint can avoid the fact and just pretend that you are following the painting.
As mentioned earlier, unless the original image is the same, the transferred image will never be the same.
The unnatural part is not the so-called problem of barbs. We have already adopted barbs in the Saint Seiya set.
The point is that it is definitely not the thinking mode of ordinary painters. When you see two oblique angles that are close to each other,
Why should we deliberately stagger one in order to pursue subtle expressions?
In fact, as long as you enlarge the image a little more, the image conversion software will smooth the two slopes exactly the same.
Let’s add more here
http: www.flickr.com photos joanmoon 3624873982
. .
,
maple . , " "
. .' }>, '
, { ㄧ >
ㄟ<7 . . .
> > λ
λ { "
{ } , λ
. . '
" ㄟ.人}, ㄟ , } '
. . { ζ " '
v
Look at this picture. This is the flaw revealed by his competitive mentality.
Let’s compare it. Isn’t the proportion quite accurate?
Why is the character's right eye missing and his hairstyle different?
This is the disadvantage of using this image transfer software
When you change the image of a person, the details become blurred together as the image becomes smaller, especially the eyes.
In fact, it is precisely because the proportion of the transferred image is correct that this result is achieved.
As the image becomes smaller, the space occupied by the eyes also becomes smaller.
When you transfer the image to a larger image, the charm will be more accurate because the details of the outline of the eyes are also clear and there is enough space to express them.
When others misunderstand that what you wrote is original, do you immediately jump out to clarify?
When he was kicked, he recovered very quickly.
I don’t go to the site very often. I probably use my clone to keep observing.
The bunch of design calligraphy characters in front are also not original.
http: www.ooopic.com home 5 96 309 .html
You have to turn it out one by one for everyone to see, right? Has there been any clarification?
This is also not a so-called reference picture or copyright issue, but a character issue and a vanity issue.
The apology afterwards was just a last resort.
That's right. I touched my conscience in the middle of the night. Can I sleep?
No need to make an appointment at all, the truth has been revealed
I believe there are still people with sharp eyes.
I really want to make an appointment. I dare to come out to draw. I don’t know who it is that talks a lot of nonsense and blurs the focus.
I'm sorry I won't dance to your ghost stories
If you want to start a war of words, find someone else.
But no one wants you to disappear, all they want is honesty
I believe many people still like your line processing
Why haven’t I kicked you in so many years? Think about it for yourself
Sending station: ptt.cc
Recommended by kissinwang: You actually said it so clearly... 05 01 11:11
kissinwang: Related to big works. Fortunately, I also backed up the parts I wanted...囧 05 01 11:13
kissinwang: Actually, I have to thank you very much for sharing it here. Speaking of my previous articles, 05 01 11:14
kissinwang: Copied by the communist bandits... without my name attached 囧 05 01 11:15
furbyyeh: The ptt platform is really great. Thanks to ptt code for enlarging the width. There is more room for play. 05 01 11:36
Recommend dannc: I should say that Shen Yun is not very accurate, right? 05 01 12:08
el4e8d: Big P also apologized for the calligraphy thing. Why bother to pursue the thing that has been apologized for? 05 01 14:28
Recommend xfroscar: Ga please put those food pictures back > <a 05 01 15:10
max9970: What do you want? What benefits does this do to this edition? 05 01 15:34
max9970: I’m really afraid that I won’t be able to see such touching pictures in the future. 05 01 15:35
onelife: P Dafa Tu never said there is no reference. To be honest, I don’t understand what G Da is doing... 05 01 15:59
Push icosahedron: Even though G may be wrong, this discussion is definitely beneficial 05 01 16:04
Push abckk: What are the benefits? Did you lose two god-level figures on the asciiart board? 05 01 16:06
icosahedron: Dialogue does not need to be so tough, but others should not restrict both parties from speaking 05 01 16:06
icosahedron: Oh, you will lose more if you don’t tell the truth. Anyone with some experience will understand this. 05 01 16:07
icosahedron: In a way, the attitude of being indifferent to the truth will cause more losses. 05 01 16:09
icosahedron: It’s just that the method today is a bit inappropriate because the evidence for this kind of thing is very clear 05 01 16:10
icosahedron: Maybe everything in the past must be added to have this kind of conflict 05 01 16:10
pilione: I only see one person who keeps giving in and one person who keeps fighting. Tweet the big talk 05 01 17:05
Recommend snoopyiou: The truth should become clearer as time goes by. I also think this discussion is good and I learn a lot by the way. 05 01 17:12