作者 wengee (加油!加油!!) 站内 A_MapleFish
标题 Re: [转录]Re: [ANSI] 花
时间 Sat May 1 14:02:31 2010
───────────────────────────────────────
※ 引述《HoshinoAya (说声掰掰吧。)》之铭言∶
> 补昨天喝酒吐点。(我猜应该没人想看= = 不喜欢的人别看了。)
伏特加+cc lemon吧 XD
不过看下来就是两个点:
1.是否为程式转图
2.是否需附原图或注明
第一个根本就界定范围太大了,就算不是用转的.
也可以说是图片大小不一产生结果不一.
如果图片大小对了, 因为图模糊度所以产生结果不同. 又可以做一个争论点.
是怎样. 明明就很难去确定标准了,
还要刻意在图里找到一些"类似"特征,(还不是大多数特征 -.-)
说你不诚实不承认你有转, 阿就是没转是要怎么样.
真的是该说他"据理力争", 还是"就是争一口气"? -_-
第二个, 我想他也不是所有作品都有这样注明.
a. 动漫, 一眼就能看出是在画那一部作品. 需要附吗.
b. 自认画人物不像, 不好意思把人物名称标出来也不可以吗?(我是在说我XD)
c. 营利性质的图才会有"原创"的考量吧. 画出来是有准备卖人吗.
且色块的工具跟原始图用的工具又迥异. 充其量说是"素描"也对吧.
结论:
拜托, 这两个点根本就已经存在模糊地带了.
器量啊~要像无双游戏那样, 打赢了就器量大吗.
这样就可以当天下人了是吗. XD
看到整篇讨论串真是好气又好笑.
程式本来就是让"不会画图有需要的人方便用的".
会画图的还要被说成需要用他, 还真是ooxxoo又ooxxoo. -.-"
Author wengee Come on! Come on!! Site A MapleFish
Title Re: [Transcription]Re: [ANSI] flower
Time Sat May 1 14:02:31 2010
Quote from HoshinoAya Say Goodbye
> To make up for the vomiting caused by drinking yesterday, I guess no one wants to watch it. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.
Vodka cc lemon bar XD
But here are two points:
1. Whether the image is transferred by program
2. Is it necessary to attach original pictures or indicate
The first one simply defines the scope too much, even if it is not rotated.
It can also be said that different image sizes produce different results.
If the image size is correct, the results will be different due to the blurriness of the image. This can be another argument.
What is it? It is obviously difficult to determine the standard.
We also need to deliberately find some "similar" features in the picture, not most features.
What if I say you are dishonest and do not admit that you have converted? It means you have not converted.
Should we really say that he "argues for reasons" or "just for the sake of it"?
Secondly, I don’t think all of his works are marked in this way.
a. Animation, you can tell at a glance which work it is drawn from. Do you need to attach it?
b. I think I don’t look like drawing characters, so I’m embarrassed to mark the names of the characters, so why not? I’m talking about me XD
c. Only for-profit drawings have to be considered "original". Are you prepared to sell them to people when you draw them?
Moreover, the tools used for color blocks are completely different from those used for the original drawing. It can be said to be "sketching" at best.
in conclusion:
Come on, there is already a twilight zone between these two points.
It's like a game of Wushuang. If you win, you'll have a lot of wisdom.
This way you can be the leader of the world, right? XD
It’s so infuriating and funny to see the whole discussion thread.
The program was originally designed to be "convenient for people who can't draw and need it".
Someone who can draw is said to need to use him, it’s really ooxxoo and ooxxoo. . "