Sender: Domino domino, message area: ASCIIart Title: Re: Question 2 Sending site: Shuimu Community Mon May 11 22:25:20 2009 , within the site I personally feel that b2a is suitable for original images with clear lines such as cartoons. There is a certain detail in the original image. You can clearly know the size, specific position and connection with other parts of the image, and then modify it according to the original image. You can get satisfactory color block works, but when using b2a to deal with natural scenes like Hope, there is a lot of color interference. b2a cannot be recognized very well. I just tried it in general. Although the transferred image has a general outline, If you really want to go into detail, sometimes you will be in a dilemma of choice, that is, you may pay too much attention to b2a. They dare not make drastic modifications to achieve the desired effect; sometimes they ignore the relationship between the whole and the parts and make modifications by themselves. After that, the position of the color blocks was disturbed. The color blocks after b2a had to be torn down and started again. The use of lines clarifies the details of the entire work. After drawing the lines, the remaining work is just to color. Draw lines at small angles that don’t exist I feel like I've been wordy for a long time and haven't explained it clearly... I hope everyone can understand... In the masterpiece of Kieslowski siji partial... it is mentioned: : Line drafts or b2a can be regarded as a way to determine the general outline of the draft. : Can Xiao B, please compare these two methods?