Sender: Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy, Area: ANSI Title: [Collection][Reprint][Judgment] DixReves vs FFXeNoN Sending site: Sun and Moon Guanghua Wednesday, March 07, 2012 14:20:15, site mail daviddvd 0519 HiHigh group@quan daviddvd.net mentioned on Tuesday, December 27, 2011 23:18:18 Applicant DixReves Respondent FFXeNoN Cause of action Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. demands Withdraw or reduce punishment Relevant evidence 1. DixReves’ application for reconsideration 2. Articles related to the Complaint version 3. Articles containing the signature file published by DixReves in other discussion forums 4. The arbitration panel’s evidence collection letters will not be listed. The above evidence is displayed in the highlights area of ​​the Appeal edition x 10 7 60 Basis for arbitration Fudan University Sun Moon Guanghua Electronic Bulletin Board Implementation Measures Item 4.7 6.27 Arbitration panel discussion After reviewing relevant documents, letters and other evidence, the arbitration panel concluded that netizen Dix Reves was being prosecuted The signature file used in the newspaper’s posts and some other posts did block the introduction part. And it affects the normal reading of other netizens. After knowing it, the webmaster FFXeNoN asked him to modify the signature file. FFXeNoN failed to revise the decision in time, so the penalty for banning login rights was reasonable. Nothing inappropriate Netizen DixReves’ use of the signature file is not malicious in itself. ANSI works used for signature files It also has special significance. For signature documents in such cases, the arbitration panel recommends that the station committee provide the application with Possibility of use and the corresponding scope of use and specific rules are given so that netizens can retain this information to the greatest extent. some precious originals ruling Dismiss all claims of DixReves This ruling is final and takes effect from the date of publication. Sun Moon Guanghua BBS Arbitration Team Enforce arbitration wf moonbear Sato 2011.12.26 daviddvd 0519 HiHigh group@quan daviddvd.net mentioned on Tuesday, December 27, 2011 23:18:25 sosad. :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below qianzj mouse Hujulongpan mentioned on Tuesday, December 27, 2011 23:30:39 It is expected that the corresponding scope of use and specific rules will be given. :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below soulox 08EE 08304 08CSEY 04CSE囧 mentioned on Tuesday, December 27, 2011 23:58:18 pity... What does this mean? For signature files in such cases, the arbitration panel recommends that the Station Management Committee provide the possibility of applying for use. And give the corresponding scope of use and specific rules so that netizens can retain these to the greatest extent. Rare and original :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below yahou love has no words @心一@六anniversary mentioned on Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:51:32 Nothing interesting. Typical official language. : pity... : What does this mean? : For signature files in such situations, the arbitration panel recommends that the Station Management Committee provide the possibility of applying for use. : And give the corresponding scope of use and specific rules so that netizens can retain these to the greatest extent. : precious original : ............. omitted below Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy mentioned on Wednesday, December 28, 2011 13:26:11 So the special signature file has become extinct? :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below CandyR DixReves said he thought of a good way to prove Fermat! Mentioned on Wednesday, December 28, 2011 14:35:01 It was posted and caused trouble :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below daviddvd 0519 HiHigh group@quan daviddvd.net mentioned on Wednesday, December 28, 2011 15:16:00 pinch : It was posted and caused trouble : :Applicant by DixReves : : Respondent FFXeNoN : : Cause of action : ............. omitted below linzhihuan 221 0513 0534 mentioned on Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:53:14 I personally thought it was unheard of to have to log in within 24 hours. :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below CandyR DixReves said he thought of a good way to prove Fermat! Mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 20:23:03 Rolling all over the floor : pinch : : It was posted and caused trouble : : ............. omitted below CandyR DixReves said he thought of a good way to prove Fermat! Mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 at 21:10:25 Forget it I want to make a QMD and say this: I have a very beautiful QMD, but unfortunately there are only 6 lines here, so I can’t write them down... Ha ha : I thought it was unheard of to have to log on to the site within 24 hours. : :Applicant by DixReves : : Respondent FFXeNoN : : Cause of action : ............. omitted below Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 21:41:26 It’s really too broad. In fact, think about it, how many people still use special signature files now? This ban is useless : I personally think that it is unheard of to have to log in within 24 hours. : :Applicant by DixReves : : Respondent FFXeNoN : : Cause of action : ............. omitted below soulox 08EE 08304 08CSEY 04CSE囧 mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 21:58:43 I think using the cursor to position it will definitely block the words. So it can be said that it affects other people’s reading. So shouldn’t all cursor positioning be banned? In addition, what does it mean to influence other people’s reading? Including the post where DixReves was reported this time and all other posts using cursor qmd, neither I will definitely not let its qmd block the words I wrote, but block part of the quotation. If this blocking affects other people’s normal reading of the post, ok, it affects their reading of the quotation that is blocked. two words Then I want to say All reply posts that choose the N introduction mode affect my normal reading and should be banned. All reply posts that select R introduction mode cut off the quotations and affect my reading. They should also be banned. All reply posts that select the Y introduction mode only retain 2 levels of introductions, and the previous ones are not displayed, which affects my reading. Should also be banned In addition, I want to say that today, my qmd positioning blocked a few characters of the introduction in the original text. Tomorrow I will not use the positioned qmd, but I will draw an ANSI pattern in the reply post and then delete it. Several characters in the quotation are included. Does this affect other people’s reading? Should it be banned? The day after tomorrow, I will not use positioning qmd or draw ANSI, but directly delete a few characters in the quotation. Does this also affect other people’s reading? So what does it mean to influence other people’s reading? I have always thought that the qmd that affects other people's reading should be those codes that clear the screen, such as *[2J or *[K or the like, or code that damages the system. These ANSI versions prohibit it. This kind of positioning of qmd cannot be regarded as affecting people's reading at all. It has never been said that if the signature file exceeds the limit, it violates the site rules. Where do we start with this? I have never encountered any situation where the signature file exceeds In addition, how do you know whether the signature file exceeds or the ANSI drawn by me? How do you judge this? For example, in the picture I drew below, I accidentally blocked the quote. : It’s really too lenient. In fact, think about how many people there are now : Such a ban is useless : : I personally think that it is unheard of to have to log in within 24 hours. : : ............. omitted below soulox 08EE 08304 08CSEY 04CSE囧 mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 22:00:54 Actually, I just want to ask what kind of reading is affected? : It’s really too broad. In fact, think about how many people still use special signature files. : Such a ban is useless : : I personally think that it is unheard of to have to log in within 24 hours. : : ............. omitted below Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy mentioned on Friday, December 30, 2011 22:27:48 Who knows? Sometimes I watch BBS on the web on my mobile phone, and I feel that those A quotations are too much in the way. : Actually, I just want to ask what kind of reading is affected? : : It’s really too lenient. In fact, think about how many people still use special signature files. : : Such a ban is useless cherryfox Listen and dance, shine and shine forever I finally graduated from ANSI mentioned on Saturday, December 31, 2011 20:16:59 :Applicant DixReves : Respondent FFXeNoN : cause of action : Netizen DixReves believes that the webmaster FFXeNoN determined that his signature file violated the regulations and related handling was inappropriate. : demand : ............. omitted below qianzj mouse Hujulongpan mentioned on Monday, January 02, 2012 09:41:54 Like logic^^ : I think using the cursor to position it will definitely block the words. : So it can be said that it affects other people’s reading. : So shouldn’t all cursor positioning be banned? : What else does it mean to influence other people’s reading? : Including the post where DixReves was reported this time and all other posts using the cursor qmd, neither. : I will definitely not let its qmd block the words I wrote, but block part of the quotation. : If this blocking affects other people’s normal reading of the post, ok it affects their reading of the quotation that is blocked. : two words : Then I want to say : ............. omitted below linzhihuan 221 0513 0534 mentioned on Friday, January 13, 2012 21:12:12 Yes, yes, you are so right : I think using the cursor to position it will definitely block the words. : So it can be said that it affects other people’s reading. : So shouldn’t all cursor positioning be banned? : What else does it mean to influence other people’s reading? : Including the post where DixReves was reported this time and all other posts using the cursor qmd, neither. : I will definitely not let its qmd block the words I wrote, but block part of the quotation. : If this blocking affects other people’s normal reading of the post, ok it affects their reading of the quotation that is blocked. : two words : Then I want to say : ............. omitted below