Sender: Kieslowski under pressure , message area: ASCIIart Title: Re: Waite Tarot Description Sending station: Shuimu Community Mon Sep 1 22:57:08 2008 , within the station Ahem, start grading seriously... Let me share my personal opinion. There is no absolute in anything related to art. Right or wrong, just because you are senior doesn’t necessarily mean you are right. Well, there is a way out. I started talking nonsense... The impression of the whole set of Tarot is that the colors are bright and the shapes and postures of the characters are very vivid. But since the pear face Children's Shoes very honestly explained that most of them were borrowed from the original pictures, so... the degree of admiration should be reduced a bit, hmm... But you can’t say that if you have the original picture, it’s not your own at all. The same original picture will still be drawn by different people. Different, personal style can still be reflected. There are many examples of this, such as the small town scenery series... I don’t know what the original picture looks like, but I feel that the pear-faced children’s shoes are still better in terms of the choice of materials in the original picture. I have put a lot of effort into capturing the character's characteristics and aura very accurately, and there is no difference due to the pursuit of perfection. Things are confused with each other. Characters, backgrounds, etc. are clearly distinguishable. It's great. Some shortcomings are in the details. Some lines are a bit fragmented and some proportions are inconsistent. Perspective issues are not a big problem. If a work has a bright spot, there will be some flaws. Everyone can still tolerate it haha