Sender: fein don't bother me, message area: ANSI Title: Re: I changed it a bit Sending station: Sun and Moon Guanghua Station Wed Oct 31 18:56:23 2001, site mail I feel that Ansi should not use its limited imitation ability to try its best to imitate those very detailed things. Because in many cases it is impossible to achieve very realistic effects. Instead of racking your brains to find a barely realistic effect, Instead of replacing it with similar symbols, it is better to cleverly avoid it. For example, the e and f in my signature file are still It’s hard to align even if there are n. If you do it forcefully, it might look ugly, so I just stagger the top and bottom. Drag out the last stroke of n to break the original symmetry and gain a sense of wholeness. Also last time in the essence I saw an imitation window work in the district. At that time, I was very surprised why the author only made one corner. Instead of making a complete window, I later tried it myself and found out that if I use the same The lower border cannot be made with this method. If you use other methods, it will be inconsistent with the upper border. The author only did a small part, but this does not affect the overall sense of the work. The overall sense does not mean completeness. Wholeness refers to the harmony between various parts, which will only make people feel more real. It is mentioned in the masterpiece of swalks once laughed in the rivers and lakes: : That’s the limitation of dark silk. There will always be some discrepancies with reality. It’s better to make it as realistic as possible. Love you Forever F.ein.... Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua Station bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.83.8.108] [46 Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua Station bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.83.198.193]