发信人: Clof (回家了), 信区: ANSI_Discuss
标 题: [组四]ANSI第一章作业 by MssCmm
发信站: 日月光华 (2007年01月24日09:13:24 星期三), 站内信件
【 以下文字转载自 Clof 的信箱 】
【 原文由 MssCmm 所发表 】
1 首先进行整篇的大幅转载,必须注明作者和出处。
2 局部的转载,要看局部的特殊性,如果这个部分是整个作品的精华和最具创意特点的
部分,那么要像对待全部作品一样正式注明;而如果是不关键的元素,在较多作品中都
会出现的,则可以不必注明。
3 我觉得比起整篇的转载,关键局部的转载或者是大幅度的修改更不能容忍。作者看到
自己的作品被改得面目全非,或者用了自己的创意,却随意加入了不和谐的元素,会难
过死的吧。违背了作者的原意和初衷,就好象用米老鼠的形象制作的很拙劣。
4 而版面讨论中tuplitears中提到的idea的使用,我觉得不算是侵权。毕竟一个好的ans
i作品最重要的标志就是有idea,可以开拓ansi作品的发挥领域和创意空间启发后人。作
者看到有人能把自己的idea继承发扬一定也是很开心的。但是,当然这种idea的使用也
是有度的,如果学习idea学习的太不费脑子,里面自己的发挥和运用太少,也是不行的
。
5 而cat提到说一些简单元素使用时候是不是要标注版权的问题。我觉得要看这个元素的
独特性,如果这个元素是某副作品的中心元素或者这个作者的标志性创意,并且在使用
的时候是完全复制粘贴,那么是要打招呼的。但是如果是很简单的小图案,没有什么特
别的地方,就不是那么强硬的有要求了。
6 另外我觉得用于个人的qmd的内容比较难进行规范,完全取决于个人的自觉性,想要绝
对的规定不太现实,并且这也是作品传播的一个很好的途径。毕竟ansi画的那么辛苦,
是希望越来越多的人看到才好。
7 对于类似进版,精华区这种公共的版面领域的ansi图像的版面必须有严格的要求。因
为是公共的招牌,必须树立榜样的,坚决打击因为无知或者无赖进行的剽窃行为。因为
其实并不是所有的讨论区版主都会制作进版,所以有时借鉴是可取的,但此时一定要注
明和争取作者的同意。(我觉得等到大家的作品浏览量到达一定程度的时候,可以大家
检查一下光华的公共版面有没有剽窃或无意中侵犯版权的现象)
8 最后我觉得mote和sylow说的观点有道理的,水木以前的那次讨论我看过。真的口气非
常非常地强硬好像进行敌我批判,我觉得ansi版权的争执问题关键还是在于普及,有了
版权的概念很多人会自觉地使用时加上注明或者谨慎使用的,不论版权的观念如何,毕
竟转载和复制大多数是出于无知和一种原始的冲动和喜欢,所以处理的原则就是刚开始
是先进行沟通和互相说明情况,不要一上来就给别人定性和扣帽子。
9 然后我觉得水木还是哪个版面有进行过一个ansi剽窃的公开的,我看了之后觉得这个
很有必要,一方面是一种监督与揭发的作用,另一方面也是使大家对于什么是对版权的
不尊重,哪些标志性的符号,图像不能使用有一个清晰的了解。而且这些被转载或者使
用的全部都是很出名或者很优秀的作品,揭发这些现象的同时,也对优秀作品进行了鉴
赏。
The end *^^*
--
※ 来源:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 10.8.225.9]
--
※ 转载:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 60.173.246.91]
Sender: Clof is home, message area: ANSI Discuss
Title: [Group 4] ANSI Chapter 1 Assignment by MssCmm
Sending site: Sun and Moon Guanghua Wednesday, January 24, 2007 09:13:24, site mail
The following text is reproduced from Clof's mailbox
Originally published by MssCmm
1 First, make a large reprint of the entire article. The author and source must be indicated.
2 Partial reprinting depends on the particularity of the part. If this part is the essence of the entire work and the most creative feature
Parts should be formally noted as if they were the entire work, whereas if they are uncritical elements, they should be noted in more works.
If it will appear, there is no need to indicate it.
3 I feel that compared to the reprinting of the entire article, the reprinting of key parts or substantial modifications is more intolerable. The author sees
It would be difficult if your work was changed beyond recognition, or if you used your own creativity but randomly added disharmonious elements.
It's too bad. It goes against the author's original intention and intention. It's like it was made with the image of Mickey Mouse in a poor way.
4. As for the use of ideas mentioned in tuplelites in the forum discussion, I don’t think it is an infringement. After all, it is a good answer.
The most important sign of i's works is that they have ideas, which can open up the scope and creative space of ansi's works and inspire future generations.
Readers must be very happy to see someone inherit and carry forward their own ideas, but of course the use of such ideas is also
There is a degree. If learning an idea is too effortless and your own performance and application are too little, it will not work.
5. Cat mentioned the issue of whether copyright should be marked when using some simple elements. I think it depends on this element.
Uniqueness If this element is the central element of a certain work or the author's signature idea and is used
When it is completely copied and pasted, then it is to say hello, but if it is a very simple small pattern, there is nothing special about it.
Other places are not so tough and demanding.
6 In addition, I think it is difficult to standardize the content of personal qmd. It completely depends on the individual's consciousness.
The right regulations are not very realistic, and this is also a good way to spread the work. After all, ANSI painting is so hard.
I hope more and more people can see it
7 There must be strict requirements for the layout of ansi images in public layout areas such as the advanced version and the essence area.
As a public sign, we must set an example and resolutely crack down on plagiarism caused by ignorance or scoundrels. Because
In fact, not all forum moderators will make incoming forums, so sometimes it is advisable to learn from them, but at this time, you must pay attention.
Minghe strives for the author’s consent. I think we can wait until the number of views of your works reaches a certain level.
Check Guanghua’s public pages for plagiarism or inadvertent copyright infringement
8 Finally, I think the views expressed by mote and sylow are reasonable. I have seen Mizuki’s previous discussion, and the tone was really very good.
He is often very tough and seems to criticize ourselves and the enemy. I think the key to the ANSI copyright dispute lies in popularization.
Many people will consciously add a note when using the concept of copyright or use it with caution. Regardless of the concept of copyright, after all
Most of the reprinting and copying are out of ignorance and a primitive impulse and liking, so the principle of processing is to just start.
First, communicate and explain the situation to each other. Don’t characterize and label others right from the start.
9 Then I think Mizuki or some other forum has published ansi plagiarism. After reading it, I felt this
It is very necessary. On the one hand, it has the function of supervision and disclosure. On the other hand, it also makes everyone aware of what is copyright infringement.
Disrespect to have a clear understanding of which iconic symbols and images cannot be used and which are reproduced or used
All the works used are very famous or excellent works. While exposing these phenomena, we also appraised the excellent works.
reward
The end *^^*
Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.8.225.9]
Reprint: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 60.173.246.91]