发信人: soulfox (小o&灵狐~以华丽之名), 信区: ANSI
标 题: [组六]第二章作业 by wxbioman
发信站: 日月光华 (2007年08月06日22:49:17 星期一), 站内信件
2. 使用透明色效果制作一个ANSI。(书面提交,形式不限)
俺心目中 生物三大灌水杂志Cell Nature Science的排名.....
寒 实在水平有限 搞得有点ugly....
===========================space======================================
\
█ \
\
▂
▂
▂
3. 简化以下代码。(书面提交,提交简化后代码及显示效果)
*[1m*[4m*[5m*[33;45;31mA*[0m*[44;45;32mB*[0m*[42;32mC*[0m
简化后的结果 C其实不显示 就是个色块.....我能用空格代替么?
*[1;4;5;45;31mA*[m*[45;32mB*[m*[42m *[m
AB
4. 规范代码的意义。(书面提交,字数不限)
这个代码的规范性好像只要是有代码的东东都会提
从linux到perl到python 都在提怎样的代码规范化
个人觉得很难 如果像发表paper这样的东东,用规范化的话 有个强制认证的机构
这样也有动力
但是像ansi这样的基于灵感和创造性的东东,如果有个条条框框 或许会扼杀灵感?
我的看法
但是反过来看 规范化和标准化对于持续发展是绝对有利的
现在在光华还碰到一些id使用了非标准字符,搞得看个正常的帖子都很烦
经常不同的term也不一样
而且不用特殊的特殊代码 同样的调料搞出不一样的大菜或许更有水平
并且就像读程序一样,规范化的代码对于我们这些新手也更省力一些
有点混乱罗嗦的看法哈:)
个人觉得关键是代码规范化可以带来的立即的现实的好处还不够明显
导致了现在的困难?
--
文献要读细
实验要做细
思考要严密
莫要唉声叹气
※ 来源:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 202.127.20.31]
--
※ 转寄:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 218.78.237.54]
--
※ 转寄:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 10.8.225.9]
--
※ 修改:·wxbioman 於 08月06日00:48:19 修改本文·[FROM: 218.78.237.54]
--
※ 转寄:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 218.78.237.54]
--
※ 转寄:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 10.100.108.77]
--
※ 转载:·日月光华 bbs.fudan.edu.cn·[FROM: 10.85.48.11]
※ 修改:·soulfox 於 08月06日22:50:05 修改本文·[FROM: 10.85.48.11]
Sender: Soulfox Xiaoo&Linghu In the name of gorgeousness, message area: ANSI
Title: [Group 6] Chapter 2 Assignment by wxbioman
Sending site: Sun and Moon Guanghua Monday, August 06, 2007 22:49:17, site mail
2. Use transparent color effects to create an ANSI written submission in any format
In my mind, the ranking of Cell Nature Science, the three major biology magazines...
Han’s level is really limited, so he’s a little ugly....
space
3. Simplify the following code and submit it in writing. Submit the simplified code and display effect.
*[1m*[4m*[5m*[33;45;31mA*[0m*[44;45;32mB*[0m*[42;32mC*[0m
The simplified result is that C is not displayed, it is just a color block... Can I replace it with a space?
*[1;4;5;45;31mA*[m*[45;32mB*[m*[42m *[m
AB
4. Standardize the meaning of the code. Written submission. No limit on the number of words.
The standardization of this code seems to be mentioned as long as there is a code.
From linux to perl to python, what kind of code standardization are being mentioned?
Personally, I think it’s very difficult. If something like publishing a paper is standardized, there will be a compulsory certification agency.
This also gives motivation
But if something like ANSI is based on inspiration and creativity, if there are rules and regulations, it may stifle inspiration.
My point of view
But looking at it conversely, standardization and standardization are absolutely beneficial to sustainable development.
Now in Guanghua, I have encountered some IDs that use non-standard characters, which makes it annoying to read normal posts.
Often different terms are different
And it may be better to use the same seasonings to make different dishes without using special codes.
And just like reading a program, standardized code is less labor-intensive for us novices.
A bit confusing and wordy view:
Personally, I think the key is that the immediate practical benefits that code standardization can bring are not obvious enough.
leading to current difficulties
Read the literature carefully
Experiment carefully
Think carefully
Don't sigh
Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 202.127.20.31]
Forward: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 218.78.237.54]
Forward: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.8.225.9]
Modification: wxbioman modified this article at 00:48:19 on August 06 [FROM: 218.78.237.54]
Forward: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 218.78.237.54]
Forward: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.100.108.77]
Reprint: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 10.85.48.11]
Modification: soulfox modified this article at 22:50:05 on August 06 [FROM: 10.85.48.11]