Sender: Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy, Area: ANSI Train02 Title: Generally recognized as not considered infringement Sending site: Sun and Moon Guanghua Thursday, February 4, 2010 21:11:55, site mail 1 is the small circles you mentioned. Because the repetition is very high and the composition is relatively simple, imitation does not constitute infringement. 2. Unless others declare that they cannot use font works or they are Taiwanese works, you can basically use them. Even if it is a Taiwanese work, it is generally believed that if you post and explain that someone's font is used, there will be no problem. 3 The so-called infringing work refers to the entire work. It can be said that 60% of the content is very similar, so that’s it. As creambottle's weekly magazine said, how could the probability be so high? More than 60% of the contents of the two works are the same. They are exactly the same. It is undoubtedly an infringement. Or, strictly speaking, if the most prominent technique in a work is used, it is suspected of infringement. However, ANSI copyright is not so strict. Taiwan is very strict. In fact, I think it is a bit excessive and restricts communication. flow and development As mentioned in cindyy’s masterpiece Time is Life: : But there are so many techniques : And I found that when browsing the highlights section, I sometimes see that the elements in some different works are quite similar. : Some of it is style, forget it : There are also some processing methods such as small circles and dots, and small leaves and so on. The original author doesn’t know about this. : What should I do with this relatively small element@@ : Mentioned in Castellio percyshelley Right to Heresy : : This brings up a topic, which is also a contradiction, that is, in the growth process of ansi novice, it is indispensable to look at the predecessors. : :’s works, don’t you want to read more catalogs of original works? Just looking at them is not enough, you also need to learn from the techniques. : : Then this kind of reference may be an infringement of the borderline behavior. : : I would like to ask everyone, how do you resolve this contradiction? Is it because you have to respect copyright that you cannot learn from your predecessors at all? : ............. omitted below The glass cup refers to Wut’s works へ :: " :: :: へ :::: :: :: : " ::: へ Where can I find my lost paradise among steel and concrete? " " " Source: Sun and Moon Guanghua bbs.fudan.edu.cn [FROM: 114.93.212.*]