发信人: dntx (冬鸟听雪), 信区: ascii_club
标 题: Re: Thanks flubber
发信站: BBS 大话西游站 (Tue May 20 15:24:11 2003), 转信
【 在 flubber (跳跳马) 的大作中提到: 】
: 我相信绝对不会,软件肯定不能代替创作,我绝对支持dntx发展软件
hehe. 谢谢。//bow
: 这似乎是AI领域当中一个永恒的辩题,弱AI还是强AI?我是坚信弱AI的
: 一来软件不会审美,二来软件不能无中生有。
: 这就注定它只能辅助创作,而不能主导创作。
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
这句话要分情况细分析了。对于高手而言,可能软件不会主导创作。
而前面谈了很多关于用不用软件、怎样用软件、新手应不应该用软件的问题,
其实充分表明:
软件对一定水平的人,在一定程度上,确实会影响人的创作。
而对于向新手推荐软件的担心 也说明 对于新手,有可能出现软件主导创作的现象。
: 其实软件对于大陆asc有一个积极的意义一直没有仔细说到,
: 它提升了审美的胃口,也就是说,
: 它把一些不是美的东西从我们审美的眼界中排除了出去。
Sender: dntx winter birds listen to the snow, message area: ascii club
Title: Re: Thanks flubber
Sending station: BBS Westward Journey Station Tue May 20 15:24:11 2003, forwarded
mentioned in flubber's masterpiece:
: I believe absolutely not. Software cannot replace creation. I absolutely support dntx in developing software.
hehe. thank you bow
: This seems to be an eternal debate in the field of AI: weak AI or strong AI? I firmly believe in weak AI.
: Firstly, software cannot be aesthetically pleasing. Secondly, software cannot be made out of nothing.
: This is destined to only assist creation but not lead creation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This sentence needs to be analyzed in detail depending on the situation. For experts, the software may not dominate creation.
We talked a lot about whether to use software, how to use software, and whether novices should use software.
In fact, it fully shows
For people of a certain level, software will indeed affect people’s creation to a certain extent.
The worry about recommending software to novices also shows that for novices, software may dominate creation.
: In fact, the software has a positive significance for mainland ASC and has not been mentioned in detail.
: It enhances the aesthetic appetite. That is to say
: It excludes some things that are not beautiful from our aesthetic vision