发信人: justify (杂杂)
标 题: Re: 我来写写昨晚与sohu讨论关于zixia字库的事2
发信站: 水木社区 (Sat Aug 19 18:29:43 2006), 站内
wow
我猜想flubber前辈还是会接受ascii和web商业合作这个趋势的
但这种合作一定会取得成功么?
即使成功,ascii创作群体获得的收益又占到多大成分?
zixia字库若广受欢迎,下一步必将是ascii图的web化,而用软件是不可能做到的
势必需要大量的创作力,而现在ascii断层现象越来越严重,如何延续asciiart的
生命力尚存在疑问,如何保证它的web化不会是走向自杀?设想所有人都习惯了直
接用现成的web化的ascii,连term都不用上,ascii如何继续繁荣?
前面的设想都是以无酬或者只对修改者付酬为前提的,而解决问题的关键我认为就
在这里——ascii的使用商业化了,那么它的创作和修改也必须商业化。
没错,sohu有理由认为asciiers辛辛苦苦的字库是默认别人可以使用的,但那不是
商业使用,这个还是不能被他们蒙蔽。即便是web下的图图也是这样。
sohu居然可以这么有说服力,真的是很佩服!!!
最大的问题是,他要是用了我们也没有精力跟他纠缠,但如果sohu坚持找人修改且
不对原创作者进行任何形式的付酬,我认为,那就大可不必理他们,或者甚至可以
假意去找sina@@,反正不给他们修改,看他们怎么用!
Sender: justify Zaza
Title: Re: Let me write about the discussion with sohu last night about the zixia font 2
Sending site: Shuimu Community Sat Aug 19 18:29:43 2006 , within the site
wow
I guess Flubber seniors will still accept the trend of business cooperation between ASCII and web.
But will this cooperation be successful?
Even if it succeeds, how much of the revenue will the ascii creative community account for?
If the zixia font library becomes popular, the next step will definitely be to web-enable ASCII graphics, which is impossible to do using software.
It will definitely require a lot of creativity, and now the ascii fault phenomenon is getting more and more serious. How to continue asciiart?
There are still doubts about its vitality. How to ensure that its webization will not lead to suicide? It is assumed that everyone is used to direct communication.
Use ready-made web-based ASCII without even using term. How can ASCII continue to prosper?
The previous assumptions are all based on the premise that there will be no compensation or only compensation for the modifiers. I think the key to solving the problem is
Here the use of ascii is commercialized, so its creation and modification must also be commercialized.
That's right, Sohu has reason to think that the font library that Asciiers worked so hard on can be used by others by default, but that's not the case.
For commercial use, you still can’t be fooled by them. This is true even for Tutu on the web.
I really admire how sohu can be so persuasive.
The biggest problem is that if he uses it, we don’t have the energy to fight with him. But if sohu insists on finding someone to modify it and
Without paying any form of compensation to the original authors, I think you can ignore them or even
Pretend to go to sina@@ anyway, I won’t let them modify it and let’s see how they use it!