ASCII侵权暴光周刊005期 作者:creambottle 发表于zixia站ascii club俱乐部 序言 这期和上期周刊间隔长达两周多的时间 最近事情较多 无法专心写这个 很抱歉 本周刊暂时状态基本属于个人的兴趣产物 但一直离不开很多朋友的帮助和指点 如果对于周刊中的ASCII侵权事件有质疑或有其他想法 都欢迎找我讨论 清理了位于新水木的Blog http: creambottle.mysmth.net 虽然Web下不能正常显示ASCIIart图 不过能方便有新水木帐号的朋友直接留言 :P 暂时还没有匿名留言功能和ASCIIart正确显示两者兼得的Blog 所以就先这里吧 由于这个Blog浏览权限有分级 我会在好友区放下期周刊的大概想法 想参加讨论的asciier请在Blog的公开区留言 我会给你参加好友区讨论的权限 telnet登陆 C 系统信息及服务 >J 水木Blog 在C开头的blog翻到creambottle的Blog 本周刊原则上允许对外转载 但转载的时候必须整篇完整转载 什么是侵权?? 不可避免的又说到这个"侵权"究竟为何物的问题 ASCIIart版权我们平时说到这个词一般来说只指的小范围 大范围可以Google查阅 "对网络著作权纠纷案的司法解释" 在下面不特指的情况下,都是指小范围内的各BBS内 的范围 当然不管是哪个范围,都是一样尊重原作者权益和打击ASCIIart侵权行为的 在BBS里,ASCIIart作品的原作者拥有该作品的ASCIIart版权 未经原作者授权同意的情况下如下行为均为严重侵犯ASCIIart版权 1 擅自篡改他人原创作品并宣称为自己的作品的行为 2 明显截取他人原创作品主要素材并宣称为自己原创的行为 3 拿他人原创作品以任何形式将作者标记改换为自己id的行为 未经原作者授权同意的情况下如下行为均为一般侵犯ASCIIart版权 1 完整转载作品但不标注作者信息 2 转载作品时不完全转载,截取转载或其他非恶性行为 作为一个ASCII画手,最基本的ASCII道德就是尊重和维护ASCIIart版权 如果纵容肆意的侵权行为,对于ASCIIart原创的环境打击可想而知 但我们平时的情况下也不要都是草木皆兵,遇到类似的情况,说明和提醒为主 毕竟不是所有的上BBS的id都明白ASCIIart的版权的意义 最可怕的盗版 实际上是出自asciiart这个圈子里一些不尊重版权的asciier 身为asciiart一员 不好好珍惜这个环境 而去肆意践踏ascii版权实在很龌龊 而这里不乏一些小站点甚至中等站点的站方ascii上出现盗版 很让人为之脸红 如何避免出现侵权行为 使用非原创作品如何避免出现侵权行为 1.完整使用原作品并完整标注作者信息 2.涉及需要修改,征询并通知原作者 使用非原创作品经常会遇到如下情况,那遇到该如何处理呢 1.由于现实情况联系不到原作者的情况下还能使用非原创作品么 能,但一定要完整使用并完整标注作者信息 这种情况下 原作者事后知道了 一般也不会引起纠纷的 如果是联系不到原作者但需要改动非原创作品 这种情况是不允许的 最好放弃使用 修改必须得到授权 没有授权下修改非原创作品 都属于严重侵权行为 2.找到想用的非原创作品,但是不知道原作者是谁 这种情况下最好不要使用该作品 并最好去人气比较高的asciiart版面询问作者 如能询问到作者是谁 那么请标注上作者信息的情况下完整使用该作品 当然如果能找到原作者并征询意见 那就更尽善尽美了 3.作品面积比较小标不下作者信息怎么办 或者觉得标上作者信息很影响画面效果呢 标不下作者信息的情况下 除非作者授权不标 那么最好放弃使用该副作品 标上作者信息很影响画面效果怎么办 可以选择同背景色"隐形"标注作者信息 但绝不能因为怕麻烦或者影响效果之类的想法而不标注 你一时偷懒的行为 加大了这副作品被频繁"侵权"的几率 转载非原创作品如何避免出现侵权行为 1.完整转载非原创作品并完整标注作者信息 例如 by 作者id@发表站 2.对于非原创作品,未经过原作者授权不要随意修改作品和标题内容 对于作者在原发站有声明是送人的作品 转载的时候请尽量在同篇转载文中说明 各站asciiart的斑竹对于涉嫌侵权的asciiart作品多份谨慎 可从源头上阻止侵权发生 比如:对于涉嫌的作品版面不标记或提醒加上完整作者信息后再标记 对各位原创作者的呼吁 1.希望大家发表原创作品的时候尽量在作品内容中标记上作者id@站点名字 比如隐形标 这样可以减低识别原作者的难度 2.如果不介意某副作品成为公共素材 那么发文的时候能说明一下就最好了 3.如果遇到比较恶意的侵权行为 可以到对应站asciiart版面寻求帮助 4.如果恶意的站级行为 可以对整个站发表不授权声明 有必要的时候可以联合更多人 被侵权率很高的两副作品 1.这副是aqua@蓝色星空的作品 具体位置在蓝色星空站ASCIIart版第2929篇 . .. : , . . . . . . . .. , . ⌒ .; . . ". " , , , ヘ . . . ;". .: . , , , ' ;", , : . . . . , . . ' . . .. , ⌒ . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . : . . . , by aqua missing you 2.这副是zycw@白云黄鹤的作品 具体位置在白云黄鹤站ASCIIart版第5487篇 . . * . . ﹡ ﹡ 乀 . ﹡ ﹡ ; ; . zycw@白云黄鹤 . ﹡ ﹡ .  . ﹡ . 经常出现的侵权现象 1.新手asciier有时候会出现截取某副非原创作品的一部分做为作品的一部分来发表 这时候就需要对应asciiart的斑竹有起码的责任心了 说实话 对于新手作品出彩的部分至少要询问创作心得 而不是简单m上甚至b做为鼓励 截取素材已经是严重侵权 斑竹纵容对于版面的良性发展没有任何正面的作用 千里之堤 溃于蚁穴 要从细部入手才有可能 新手的版权教育是很重要的环节 当然如果你说反正几个月之后也不是斑竹了管那么细做什么 那我也实在无话可说 斑竹对版面的影响是无形的 在asciier心里榜上有名的某些盗版站就是这么出名的 2.随意使用tw作者的作品 实际上tw站对于asciiart版权管理更为严格 如果不询问作者就用 就会被认定为侵权 而出现在大陆各bbs上的所有tw站的asciiart更多是希望大家从欣赏的角度去看待的 所以对于tw站的asciiart作品建议大家不要使用 哪怕是标了作者使用的 尤其是在站级的角度 没有授权 不应该使用tw站的asciiart作品 3.不完整使用作品或不完整标注作者信息 Asciiart works on the Mainland Station are not allowed to be used except when the original author publishes them. The default rule of the mainland website is that if the author's information is fully marked, there will be no infringement issues if the work is used in its entirety. But complete means that no characters or details of the original work are changed. It’s not like what some people understand. I intercepted part of the picture and used it as material, and then said thank you to the original author. This kind of behavior must obtain the original author's authorization to modify it. If there is no authorization, this behavior is a serious infringement. If the author's information cannot be marked, it is best to give up the use of the sub-work unless authorized by the author. What should I do if marking the author information affects the picture effect? ​​You can choose to mark the author information "invisibly" with the same background color. But you must not not mark it because you are afraid of trouble or affecting the effect. Your temporary laziness increases the chance that this work will be frequently "infringed" 4. Incomplete reprinting when reprinting Here we call on asciiart owners on all sites not to mark asciiart works that do not have complete work information. Because this will increase the chance that the modified work will be infringed. When reprinting, if the author has any relevant work descriptions on the original website, it is best to reprint them together in the same article. In this way, works can be better protected The reprinting of asciiart's works is for appreciation, not to facilitate infringement. For this purpose, it is better not to put the cart before the horse. Recently, the infringement phenomenon of some small sites has been relatively serious. I won’t name them one by one. I will write more slowly when I have time. I hope everyone will regulate themselves and avoid the phenomenon of multiple asciers jointly boycotting a certain website on a certain day. Serious infringement will hinder communication between asciers. It’s so serious that even reprinting requires authorization. I don’t know whether to be happy or sad. Therefore, I hope that all asciers will cherish the original environment of asciiart. Start from yourself and start now to protect the original environment. What is originality My understanding is that original ascii works are a collection of characters with the author's special ideas. Not a simple set of characters can be marked with an author ID and involve copyright issues. In the following situations, I think it is not appropriate to mark your own ID to be recognized as original: 1. Due to the emergence of various image conversion tools, such as bmp2ascii, there have been a number of tools that can be used to simply convert images. An asciiart work published without even making any post-revisions. This kind of work really shouldn’t be called a work. At most it’s just a blank, and it’s not suitable to take it out and post it on the page before it’s been trimmed :P It is even more inappropriate to label your work with your own ID or claim that it is your own work. It is really embarrassing behavior. 2. For example: A simple combination of villains like this has a high chance of repeating ideas and is not suitable for copyright marking. H Generally speaking, works that can be labeled with author ID should be unique. That is to say, it is very difficult for ASCII works with the same idea to be original in the spatial arrangement and color matching of characters. This sentence is a bit awkward to say. I hope everyone can understand what I mean. Imitation and reference are not ulterior scandals Imitating and borrowing some details from excellent ASCII works is a necessary step for many novices to learn ASCII painting techniques. But what is imitation? It is definitely not simply taking a certain part of the picture and using it as your own material. Instead, I carefully analyze the color ratio and character usage of the parts I admire, and then start painting them myself. Do it based on your own ideas. If there are too many overlapping details, it is best to seek the opinions of the original author. It would be better if you could tell me which work you imitated or borrowed from when publishing. In the world of asciiart, humility and honesty can help you gain respect and the greatest support from others. If "suspected" infringing works appear again and again, then the reputation of the so-called ASCII will basically be ruined. Even if it's been many years, when someone mentions your ID, if someone says, "Ah, it's that so-and-so again." Although BBS is virtual, I think most asciers don’t want to see this kind of reputation. Conclusion This is the end of this issue. There are relatively few infringing materials in this issue, mainly due to insufficient preparation during this period. Thank you for your support and help to the weekly. Thank you. Everyone is welcome to provide me with various sources of information on ascii piracy. Zixia website or Xinshuimu's creambottle are both acceptable. See you next time