发信人: flubber (跳跳马)
标 题: Re: ascii到底为了什么呢
发信站: BBS 大话西游站 (Mon Mar 24 16:26:51 2003), 转信
艺术是共通的,构图和取景在asciiart中始终都有运用。
当然,构图也只是对大幅作品而言,总不能对小的asciilet
也这么要求吧。
艺术门类肯定也各有各的欣赏方向,就象绘画,欣赏时的
趣味点就并非全在构图、用光、色彩之上。摄影对构图的苛求
是这个艺术门类本身的特点所决定的(如lastwaiting所言)
小ascii图就谈不上什么构图,说形象设计也未尝不可,
(形象设计也是一门学问,并不比摄影来的简单。)
asciiart的欣赏趣味点,很大程度上在于用字,
这是其他任何一种艺术所不具备的,在判断好与不好的标准上
肯定也有所区别。
至于累坏了眼睛值不值得,
所谓艺术,某种程度上说就是"为他人所不能为"。
如果连精益求精都做不到,还能称得上什么艺术呢。
asciiart也并非只有理工科学生在画,
象monicaclover,iamppkl,虽说我对她们的背景毫不了解,
但猜测肯定不是理工科(建筑除外)。
Sender: flubber hopping vault
Title: Re: What is ascii for?
Sending station: BBS Westward Journey Mon Mar 24 16:26:51 2003, forwarded
Art is universal. Composition and framing are always used in asciiart.
Of course, composition is only for large-scale works, and cannot always be done for small asciilet works.
That’s what I ask for too
Art categories certainly have their own appreciation directions, just like the appreciation of paintings.
The interesting point is not all in the composition. On top of the use of light and color, photography has strict requirements on composition.
It is determined by the characteristics of this art category itself, as lastwaiting said
Small ASCII pictures can’t be said to have composition, but image design is not a bad idea.
Image design is also a science, and it is not simpler than photography.
The fun point of appreciating asciiart lies largely in the use of words
This is something that no other art has in terms of criteria for judging good or bad.
There must be a difference
As for whether it’s worth it to tire your eyes out?
The so-called art, to a certain extent, means "doing what others cannot do"
If you can't even strive for perfection, what kind of art can you call it?
asciiart is not just about science and engineering students painting
Like monicaclover iamppkl although I have no idea about their background
But I guess it’s definitely not science and engineering, except architecture.